Printable Format65-4142.
History: L. 1992, ch. 298, § 84; L. 1993, ch. 291, § 251; L. 1996, ch. 257, § 1; Repealed, L. 2009, ch. 32, § 64; July 1.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Multiplicitous to charge illegal sale of drugs and receiving proceeds from illegal drug transactions. State v. Betz, 29 Kan. App. 2d 575, 30 P.3d 1037 (2001).
2. For conviction hereunder defendant must know drug proceeds were previously derived from conduct violating Uniform Controlled Substance Act. State v. McGrew, 29 Kan. App. 2d 1051, 36 P.3d 334 (2001).
3. Section is violated when defendant transports proceeds known to be derived from violation of Uniform Controlled Substances Act. State v. Romo-Uriarie, 33 Kan. App. 2d 22, 97 P.3d 1051 (2004).
4. Cited; court not required to impose nonprison sentence even when such sentence is presumed, when. State v. Andelt, 40 Kan. App. 2d 796, 797, 195 P.3d 1220 (2008).