Printable Format81-111.
History: L. 1951, ch. 525, § 1; L. 1963, ch. 510, § 1; Repealed, L. 1999, ch. 85, § 21; July 1.
Law Review and Bar Journal References:
"Intellectual Property," Duane C. Bowen, 32 J.B.A.K. 7, 15 (1963).
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Cited; confusingly similar buildings and logo design held violation of plaintiff's common-law trademark rights. Fotomat Corp. v. Cochran, 437 F. Supp. 1231, 1245.
2. Whether service mark must be advertised and rendered in this state to be "used" under section examined. Gragg v. Rhoney, 20 Kan. App. 2d 123, 129, 884 P.2d 443 (1994).