Printable Format66-146.
History: R.S. 1923, 66-146; L. 1988, ch. 356, § 231; Repealed, L. 2005, ch. 21, § 12; July 1.
Source or Prior Law:
L. 1905, ch. 340, § 4; L. 1907, ch. 268, § 9.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Writ of mandamus may issue notwithstanding remedy provided for herein. Larabee v. Railway Co., 74 Kan. 808, 822, 88 P. 72. Affirmed: Missouri Pacific Ry. v. Larabee Mills, 211 U.S. 612, 29 S. Ct. 214, 53 L.Ed. 352.
2. Force and effect of order made under this section considered. The State v. Railway Co., 70 Kan. 467, 483, 92 P. 606. Affirmed: Mo. Pac. Ry. Co. v. Kansas, 216 U.S. 262, 30 S. Ct. 330, 54 L.Ed. 472.
3. Notice and hearing required in establishment of freight terminals. Railway Co. v. Railway Commissioners, 85 Kan. 229, 116 P. 896.
4. Every freight rate must be reasonable and just. Railroad Co. v. Utilities Commission, 95 Kan. 604, 611, 148 P. 667.
5. Schedules must be reasonable and just; commission may amend or alter. Milling Co. v. Postal Telegraph Co., 101 Kan. 307, 310, 116 P. 493.
6. Action to recover intrastate railroad-car rental charges; charges legal under commission's order. Keeler Co. v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Rly. Co., 187 Kan. 125, 128, 354 P.2d 368.