Printable Format66-112.
History: L. 1911, ch. 238, § 15; R.S. 1923, 66-112; L. 1959, ch. 257, § 1; L. 1981, ch. 256, § 1; L. 1983, ch. 220, § 1; L. 1986, ch. 318, § 114; L. 1988, ch. 356, § 223; L. 1995, ch. 14, § 1; Repealed, L. 2005, ch. 21, § 12; July 1.
Source or Prior Law:
L. 1901, ch. 286, § 9.
Cross References to Related Sections:
Hearings and investigations, see also 66-1511, 66-1512.
Law Review and Bar Journal References:
Amendment of 1959 explained in 1957-59 survey of constitutional and administrative law, Fred N. Six and John W. Brand, Jr., 8 K.L.R. 222, 235 (1959).
"Practice and Procedure Before the State Corporation Commission," Fred B. Adam, 41 J.B.A.K. 199, 200 (1972).
"Transportation in Transition: KCC Regulation of Motor Carriers into the 1980's," Mary Piper Wettig, 57, No. 5, J.K.B.A. 19, 21, 23, (1988).
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Commission changing railroad freight rates; notice of hearing required. The State, ex rel., v. Railway Co., 108 Kan. 847, 849, 850, 197 P. 192.
2. Cited in construing reparations statute. State, ex rel., v. Public Service Comm., 135 Kan. 491, 504, 11 P.2d 999.
3. Order authorizing railroad to dualize station agencies valid; burden of proof; reasonableness. Community of Woodston v. State Corporation Comm., 186 Kan. 747, 752, 755, 353 P.2d 206.
4. Mentioned in opinion reversing district court's judgment on review of commission's utility rate order. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. State Corporation Commission, 192 Kan. 39, 46, 386 P.2d 515.
5. Provisions of section held not applicable on an application by a railroad to substitute service by mobile agency routes for services by station agencies. Missouri Pacific Rld. Co. v. State Corporation Commission, 205 Kan. 610, 612, 613, 614, 615, 616, 617, 626, 470 P.2d 767.
6. Customers of utility companies had remedy in state courts and could not bring action in federal court; action challenging legality of late assessment charges. Tennyson v. Gas Service Co., 506 F.2d 1135, 1141.