Printable Format65-2848.
History: L. 1957, ch. 343, § 48; L. 1976, ch. 273, § 22; L. 1979, ch. 198, § 7; Repealed, L. 1984, ch. 313, § 157; July 1, 1985.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Findings of board supported by substantial evidence; district court may not substitute its judgment for that of the board; revocation of license upheld. Kansas State Board of Healing Arts v. Foote, 200 Kan. 447, 449, 450, 436 P.2d 828.
2. Cited in construing K.S.A. 44-1011 as not imposing trial de novo in derogation of constitutional doctrine of separation of powers. Jenkins v. Newman Memorial County Hospital, 212 Kan. 92, 98, 510 P.2d 132.
3. Cited in holding K.S.A. 60-2101 (a) does not permit trial de novo in district court from order of administrative agency. Copeland v. Kansas State Board of Examiners in Optometry, 213 Kan. 741, 742, 518 P.2d 377.
4. Applied; suspension of license to practice professional nursing held arbitrary and unreasonable. Kansas State Board of Nursing v. Burkman, 216 Kan. 187, 188, 190, 531 P.2d 122.
5. Referred to in determining scope of review on appeal from school board decision limited by K.S.A. 60-2101. Brinson v. School District, 223 Kan. 465, 468, 576 P.2d 602.
6. Appealing party has 60 days from entry of order to file notice of appeal; ten-day notice merely advisory. Kansas State Board of Healing Arts v. Dickerson, 229 Kan. 627, 628, 629, 630, 629 P.2d 187 (1981).