Printable Format65-1201.
History: L. 1913, ch. 290, § 2; R.S. 1923, 65-1201; Repealed, L. 1957, ch. 343, § 91; July 1.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. "Osteopathy" is not included in term "practicing medicine." State, ex rel., v. Eustace, 117 Kan. 746, 233 P. 109.
2. Cited; city ordinance regulating barbers in conflict with state law held invalid. Trimble v. City of Topeka, 147 Kan. 111, 116, 75 P.2d 241.
3. Practice of medicine and surgery and osteopathy discussed and distinguished. State, ex rel., v. Gleason, 148 Kan. 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 10, 12, 79 P.2d 911. Rehearing denied: 148 Kan. 458, 84 P.2d 48. Opinion on post-decision motions: 148 Kan. 459, 83 P.2d 425.
4. Cited in case involving what constituted osteopathy prior to statute. Gafney v. Wilson County Hospital, 152 Kan. 1, 2, 102 P.2d 893.
5. Practice of medicine and surgery and osteopathy discussed and distinguished. State, ex rel., v. Moore, 154 Kan. 193, 196, 201, 202, 117 P.2d 598.
6. Osteopaths held not entitled to federal narcotic licenses. Burke v. Kansas State Osteopathic Association, 111 F.2d 250.
7. Section as construed by Kansas supreme court is constitutional. Gleason v. Carlson, 92 F. Supp. 280, 282, 284.