Printable Format59-3030.
History: L. 1965, ch. 347, § 30; L. 1983, ch. 191, § 27; L. 1989, ch. 173, § 7; Repealed, L. 2002, ch. 114, § 81; July 1.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Cited in holding probate court not authorized to determine ownership and distribute assets in settling conservatorship estate. In re Estate of Ingram, 212 Kan. 218, 224, 510 P.2d 597.
2. Cited; circumstances rendering order approving claims voidable due to conservator's substantial conflict of interest (K.S.A. 59-1703), "other interested parties" examined. In re Conservatorship of L.M.S., 12 Kan. App. 2d 725, 726, 755 P.2d 22 (1988).
3. Whether attorney's failure to advise coconservators of accounting requirements proximately caused conversion penalties precluded summary judgment. Winter v. Hope, 253 Kan. 678, 682, 684, 861 P.2d 1282 (1993).