Printable Format52-214.
History: L. 1905, ch. 310, § 21; R.S. 1923, 52-214; Repealed, L. 1965, ch. 564, § 416; January 1, 1966.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Only bona fide holder may recover on note fraudulently procured. Bank v. Claypool, 91 Kan. 248, 251, 137 P. 949.
2. Unfilled blanks in draft may be filled; alteration and completion distinguished. State Bank v. Hartford Bros., 116 Kan. 262, 266, 226 P. 750.
3. Holder of note has prima facie authority to fill blanks. Clark v. Layman, 144 Kan. 711, 718, 62 P.2d 897.
4. User of note executed in blank contrary to purpose of person executing note, not holder in due course. Giblin v. Beeler, 396 F.2d 584, 586.