Printable Format39-708.
History: L. 1937, ch. 327, § 8; L. 1951, ch. 288, § 2; L. 1963, ch. 255, § 2; L. 1965, ch. 286, § 1; L. 1967, ch. 245, § 2; L. 1969, ch. 226, § 2; L. 1970, ch. 167, § 1; L. 1971, ch. 153, § 1; L. 1973, ch. 187, § 1; Repealed, L. 1973, ch. 186, § 42; January 1, 1974.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Discussed in holding lien provision (now repealed) constitutional. Hawkins v. Social Welfare Board, 148 Kan. 760, 761, 84 P.2d 930.
2. County board cannot sue and be sued; powers generally discussed. Dellinger v. Harper County Social Welfare Board, 155 Kan. 207, 211, 124 P.2d 513.
3. Discussed; mandatory to raise fund produced by three-mill levy; sales tax residue application. State, ex rel., v. Jackson County Board of Social Welfare, 161 Kan. 672, 675, 171 P.2d 651.
4. State welfare department may maintain action to recover fraudulent payment to recipient. State dep't of Social Welfare v. Leonard, 166 Kan. 630, 632, 633, 635, 203 P.2d 207.
5. Cited in holding insurance protection provided by K.S.A. 74-4707 through 74-4713 is applicable to county welfare director under facts of case. Mott, Executor v. Mitchell, 209 Kan. 476, 486, 487, 496 P.2d 1297.
6. Subsection (k) cited; eligibility for benefits under social welfare act does not create implied contract giving rise to a suit for damages. Valkenburgh v. State Board of Social Welfare, 211 Kan. 754, 755, 756, 508 P.2d 875.
7. Subsection (x) discussed; administrative action directing proration of fees for medical and professional services was beyond scope of board's authority. Rhodes v. Harder, 211 Kan. 820, 822, 823, 825, 826, 829, 830, 831, 508 P.2d 959. Motion to modify decision; portion of original opinion withdrawn: 212 Kan. 500, 501, 512 P.2d 354.
8. Mentioned; class action contesting state welfare department's "value of moderate home" rule as applied to recipients of housing relocation payments. Young v. Harder, 361 F. Supp. 64, 68, 73.
9. Board of social welfare manual and regulation setting nursing home services fees on cost plus basis repugnant to statutes. Seneca Nursing Home v. Kansas State Bd. of Social Welf., 490 F.2d 1324, 1327, 1328, 1329, 1331, 1332, 1333.
10. Intent of subsection (x) is to encourage nursing homes to accept welfare recipients and to assure payment; where S.R.S. was obligor under contract, it had a duty to pay. Seneca Nursing Home v. Secretary of S.R.S., 604 F.2d 1309, 1310, 1311, 1314, 1315.
11. Certain regulations relating to charges for nursing home services held invalid. Country Club Home, Inc. v. Harder, 228 Kan. 756, 757, 758, 764, 765, 620 P.2d 1140. Opinion on motion for modification: 228 Kan. 802, 623 P.2d 505.