38-1591.
History: L. 1982, ch. 182, § 56; L. 1986, ch. 115, § 81; L. 1994, ch. 301, § 10; L. 2000, ch. 150, § 22; Repealed, L. 2006, ch. 200, § 120; January 1, 2007.
Law Review and Bar Journal References:
"Kansas Appellate Advocacy: An Inside View of Common-Sense Strategy," Patrick Hughes, 66 J.K.B.A. No. 2, 26 (1997).
"The Effect of Domestic Violence on Parental Rights in Kansas after In re Adoption of A.P.," Amy E. Wilbur, 39 W.L.J. 288 (2000).
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Cited; orders issued under K.S.A. 60-1610(a)(4)(D) are appealable like their counterparts in chapter 38. Tindell v. Tindell, 10 Kan. App. 2d 34, 35, 690 P.2d 965 (1984).
2. In appeal from magistrate judge's decision, district court must hear case as if originally filed. In re K.J., 12 Kan. App. 2d 188, 190, 737 P.2d 874 (1987).
3. Trial de novo required on appeal to district court from proceeding pursuant to K.S.A. 38-1501 et seq. In re K.J., 242 Kan. 418, 748 P.2d 419 (1988).
4. Court-appointed special advocate (CASA) held not to have interested party status in child in need of care proceedings. In re D.D.P., Jr., 249 Kan. 529, 536, 819 P.2d 1212 (1991).
5. Appeal from denial of motion to terminate parental rights appealable as an order of disposition. In re T.D.W., 18 Kan. App. 2d 286, 850 P.2d 947 (1993).
6. District court standard of review for appeal of termination of parental rights by magistrate on the record is substantial competent evidence. In re J.H., 25 Kan. App. 2d 372, 378, 962 P.2d 1127 (1998).
7. Trial court order dismissing termination of parental rights is appealable under collateral order doctrine. In re C.H.W., 26 Kan. App. 2d 413, 415, 988 P.2d 276 (1999).
8. Section does not require verification of notice of appeal when other party has not been personally served with process. In re J.A., 30 Kan. App. 2d 416, 42 P.3d 215 (2002).
9. Order of temporary custody is a final order and must be appealed in 30 days; court has no jurisdiction to consider untimely appeal. In re D.I.G., 34 Kan. App. 2d 34, 114 P.3d 173 (2005).
10. Verification of brief applies only to appellant. In re C.B., 34 Kan. App. 2d 317, 117 P.3d 888 (2005).
11. Mentioned, there is no right to appeal from district court judgment regarding SRS placement with potential adoptive families. In re A.F., 38 Kan. App. 2d 742, 746, 172 P.3d 63 (2007).