38-1534.
History: L. 1982, ch. 182, § 30; Repealed, L. 2006, ch. 200, § 120; January 1, 2007.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Cited in holding incapacitated parent entitled to service on guardian and conservator (K.S.A. 60-304(c)) in severance proceedings. In re Baby Boy Bryant, 9 Kan. App. 2d 768, 770, 774, 689 P.2d 1203 (1984).
2. Due process requires service on nearest blood relative where parent cannot be located with due diligence. In re L.S., 14 Kan. App. 2d 261, 264, 788 P.2d 875 (1990).
3. Child in need of care proceedings discussed generally, with emphasis on roles of respective parties thereto. In re D.D.P., Jr., 249 Kan. 529, 532, 819 P.2d 1212 (1991).
4. Parents denied due process by notice defects surrounding motion to terminate rights. In re H.C., 23 Kan. App. 2d 955, 939 P.2d 937 (1997).
5. Under facts, short notice prior to hearing on service by publication did not prejudice mother. In re J.H., 25 Kan. App. 2d 372, 382, 962 P.2d 1127 (1998).