38-815.
History: L. 1957, ch. 256, § 15; L. 1965, ch. 278, § 4; L. 1972, ch. 153, § 57; L. 1973, ch. 134, § 39; L. 1974, ch. 446, § 18; L. 1974, ch. 178, § 1; L. 1976, ch. 207, § 13; L. 1978, ch. 158, § 10; L. 1980, ch. 122, § 2; Repealed, L. 1982, ch. 182, § 150; January 1, 1983.
Source or prior law:
38-411(b), (c), 38-413(e).
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. 1965 act changed substantive law and is prospective in application. State v. Augustine, 197 Kan. 207, 416 P.2d 281.
2. Act raising jurisdictional age limit for juveniles not retroactive in application. State v. Coutcher, 198 Kan. 282, 285, 424 P.2d 865.
3. Section does not prohibit the questioning of juvenile by police officers prior to being taken to juvenile court. State v. Hinkle, 206 Kan. 472, 476, 478, 480, 479 P.2d 841.
4. Confession is not admissible merely because person making it is a minor; nor are confessions or admissions voluntarily made inadmissible because made when accused was without counsel. State v. Hinkle, 206 Kan. 472, 476, 478, 480, 479 P.2d 841.
5. Refusing to suppress photograph and in-court identification in criminal proceeding not reversible errors. State v. Winston, 214 Kan. 525, 526, 527, 520 P.2d 1204.
6. Detention of juvenile and denial of bail did not contravene federal or state constitutions; no right to bail under code. Pauley v. Gross, 1 Kan. App. 2d 736, 739, 574 P.2d 234.
7. Mentioned; parent has right of access to court's social file in a deprived child action. Nunn v. Morrison, 227 Kan. 730, 737, 608 P.2d 1359.
8. Trial court has jurisdiction to suspend driving privileges of 16-year-old for violation of K.S.A. 8-1514 pursuant to K.S.A. 8-2117 and 38-802. State v. Seymour, 5 Kan. App. 2d 95, 96, 97, 612 P.2d 1248.
9. General references to persons interested in child not sufficient authority to grant grandmother intervention in severance proceeding. Wilson & Walker v. State, 230 Kan. 49, 54, 630 P.2d 1102 (1981).
10. Statutory changes in K.S.A. 38-1602(b)(1) not retroactively applied to juvenile charged before change effective. In re Hockenbury, 9 Kan. App. 2d 450, 453, 680 P.2d 561 (1984).
11. Void conviction because of defendant's age can still serve as predicate for federal firearms violations. United States v. Mayfield, 810 F.2d 943 (1987).