Printable Format38-409.
History: L. 1905, ch. 190, § 9; R.S. 1923, 38-409; Repealed, L. 1957, ch. 256, § 39; July 1.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Age question of fact, findings erroneous, habeas corpus unavailing. In re Wallace, 75 Kan. 432, 434, 89 P. 687.
2. Neglected child; commitment; jurisdiction of district court. In re Hosford, 107 Kan. 115, 118, 190 P. 765.
3. District court has no jurisdiction to sentence delinquent under sixteen. State v. Dubray, 121 Kan. 886, 888, 250 P. 316.
4. Juvenile court should sentence on verdict in district court. State v. Dubray, 121 Kan. 886, 894, 250 P. 316.
5. Cited; word "commitment" in K.S.A. 38-412 applies to dependent and neglected children. State, ex rel., v. Hartford Accident & Ind. Co., 154 Kan. 79, 82, 114 P.2d 812.
6. Act valid although inapplicable to inmates of Boys' Industrial School. Burris v. Board of Administration, 156 Kan. 600, 602, 603, 134 P.2d 649.
7. Act discussed in determining procedure and jurisdiction to prosecute inmate committing felony. Seibert v. Ferguson, 167 Kan. 128, 130, 131, 134, 205 P.2d 484.