Printable Format38-405.
History: L. 1905, ch. 190, § 5; R.S. 1923, 38-405; Repealed, L. 1957, ch. 256, § 39; July 1.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. One having custody of child must be served with notice. In re Carter, 77 Kan. 765, 766, 93 P. 584.
2. Proceedings regular and valid; girl properly committed to industrial school. In re Turner, 94 Kan. 115, 119, 145 P. 871.
3. Effect of failure to give notice to mother discussed. Loucka v. State Department of Social Welfare, 163 Kan. 1, 4, 179 P.2d 791.
4. Proceedings are void if guardian ad litem not appointed. In re Houser, 166 Kan. 48, 49, 199 P.2d 499.
5. Act discussed in determining procedure and jurisdiction to prosecute inmate committing felony. Seibert v. Ferguson, 167 Kan. 128, 130, 131, 134, 205 P.2d 484.
6. Guardian ad litem entitled to expenses and compensation for services in supreme court. Murrow v. Powell, 167 Kan. 283, 288, 205 P.2d 1193.
7. Notice under circumstances held sufficient; all parents not notified. In re Watson, 177 Kan. 666, 667, 281 P.2d 1116.
8. Dependent-neglect proceeding; section complied with in every respect. In re McCoy, 184 Kan. 1, 2, 8, 9, 10, 334 P.2d 820.