CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Purpose of court; procedure regular and valid. In re Turner, 94 Kan. 115, 119, 145 P. 871.

2. Divorce jurisdiction over child lost when juvenile court commits child. In re Hosford, 107 Kan. 115, 117, 190 P. 765.

3. Jurisdiction of juvenile court not exclusive; jurisdiction of supreme court. Foundling Hospital v. Harrington, 113 Kan. 521, 524, 215 P. 303.

4. Probate judge to be judge of juvenile court. State, ex rel., v. Anderson, 114 Kan. 297, 298, 217 P. 327.

5. Juvenile court has exclusive jurisdiction under age of sixteen. Swehla v. Malone, 114 Kan. 712, 714, 220 P. 299.

6. Juvenile court has exclusive jurisdiction over dependent, neglected and delinquent children. State v. Dubray, 121 Kan. 886, 888, 250 P. 316.

7. Petition following statute sufficient to give juvenile court jurisdiction. In re Hollis, 124 Kan. 345, 347, 259 P. 793.

8. Case tried de novo subject to limitations of juvenile court. Hollis v. Brownell, 129 Kan. 818, 820, 284 P. 388.

9. Evidence held insufficient to support finding that child was dependent and neglected. McGrath v. Vail, 140 Kan. 312, 313, 37 P.2d 3.

10. Juvenile court has original exclusive jurisdiction over dependent and neglected children. Wilcox v. Fisher, 163 Kan. 74, 80, 180 P.2d 283.

11. Juvenile court's jurisdiction to determine whether parents giving children proper care is exclusive. Wilcox v. Fisher, 163 Kan. 74, 80, 180 P.2d 283.

12. Divorce jurisdiction over child lost when juvenile court acquires jurisdiction hereunder. Trent v. Bellamy, 164 Kan. 438, 190 P.2d 400.

13. Juvenile court's jurisdiction to determine whether child delinquent is exclusive. Houser v. Houser, 166 Kan. 45, 47, 199 P.2d 497.

14. Act discussed in determining procedure and jurisdiction to prosecute inmate committing felony. Siebert v. Ferguson, 167 Kan. 128, 130, 131, 134, 205 P.2d 484.

15. Record reviewed; findings and judgment of dependency and neglect upheld. In re Watson, 177 Kan. 666, 670, 281 P.2d 1116.

16. Act mentioned in proceeding to set aside "relinquishment" and to change custody. Leach v. Leach, 179 Kan. 557, 559, 296 P.2d 1078.

17. Act is exercise of parental power of state; liberally construed. In re McCoy, 184 Kan. 1, 2, 8, 334 P.2d 820.