Printable Format29-420.
History: R.S. 1923, 29-420; Repealed, L. 1986, ch. 195, § 9; July 1.
Source or prior law:
L. 1897, ch. 95, § 3; L. 1905, ch. 363, § 1; L. 1919, ch. 253, § 1; L. 1920, ch. 51, § 1; Revised, 1923.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Owner given twenty-nine days' notice; overseer cannot cut hedge. Hartman v. Baldwin, 103 Kan. 764, 766, 176 P. 115.
2. Complaint must point out fence with some degree of particularity. The State v. Groenmiller, 108 Kan. 840, 841, 197 P. 207.
3. Section fails to declare hedges nuisances or provide for damages. Goodaile v. Cowley County, 111 Kan. 542, 544, 207 P. 785.
4. Service of notice by mail sufficient if received by owner. Chaput v. Demars, 120 Kan. 273, 277, 243 P. 311. Rehearing denied: 120 Kan. 612, 244 P. 1042.
5. Form of notice held sufficient. Chaput v. Demars, 120 Kan. 612, 244 P. 1042.