Printable Format

Previous | Next

Revisor's Note:

Section was amended multiple times in 2006 session, see also 21-4714a.

Law Review and Bar Journal References:

Survey of Recent Cases, 45 K.L.R. 1392 (1997).

"Giving Credit when Credit is due, The Kansas law on jail time credit," Franklin R. Pierce, 69 J.K.B.A. No. 9, 22 (2000).

Attorney General's Opinions:

Victim impact statement does not attempt to improperly influence judge. 96-13.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Whether the state is statutorily precluded from challenging defendant's criminal history worksheet examined. State v. Hankins, 19 Kan. App. 2d 1036, 1044, 880 P.2d 271 (1994).

2. When trial court may take judicial notice of prior presentence investigation report in subsequent proceeding discussed. State v. Turner, 22 Kan. App. 2d 564, 565, 919 P.2d 370 (1996).

3. District court procedure when defendant challenges criminal history score discussed. State v. Lakey, 22 Kan. App. 2d 585, 586, 920 P.2d 470 (1996).

4. Incriminating statements by defendant made during presentence investigation properly suppressed where guilty plea later ruled invalid. State v. Reutebuch, 24 Kan. App. 2d 658, 659, 953 P.2d 227 (1998).

5. Inclusion of prior juvenile adjudication in criminal history violates neither Apprendi nor Gould. State v. Hatt, 30 Kan. App. 2d 84, 38 P.3d 738 (2002).

6. Burden is on prosecution when defendant objects to his criminal history classification. State v. Schow, 37 Kan. App. 2d 941, 947, 161 P.3d 222 (2007).

7. Cited; if objection filed to criminal history, state has burden to prove disputed part. State v. Schow, 287 Kan. 529, 536 to 539, 197 P.3d 825 (2008).

8. Mentioned; state breached plea agreement; prosecutor provided negative comments and no rationale for accepting plea agreement. State v. Foster, 39 Kan. App. 2d 380, 383, 180 P.3d 1074 (2008).