Printable Format

Previous | Next

Source or Prior Law:

21-652.

Law Review and Bar Journal References:

Consumer protection in the Tenth Judicial District, William P. Coates, Jr., 44 J.B.A.K. 67, 70 (1975).

"Clear Title: A Buyer's Bonus, A Lender's Loss—Repeal of U.C.C. § 9-307(1) Farm Products Exception by Food Security Act § 1324 [7 U.S.C. § 1631]," 26 W.L.J. 71, 87 (1986).

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Conviction under paragraph (1)(c) affirmed; evidence sufficient. State v. Ferguson, 221 Kan. 103, 104, 105, 107, 558 P.2d 1092.

2. History of section discussed; purpose to protect mortgagee from disposal of property by mortgagor. State v. Ferguson, 221 Kan. 103, 104, 105, 107, 558 P.2d 1092.

3. District court of district where defendant resided and security interest impaired had personal and subject matter jurisdiction. State v. Matzke, 236 Kan. 833, 834, 835, 696 P.2d 396 (1985).

4. Statute is unconstitutional because it does not contain intent to defraud as element of crime defined therein. State v. Jones, 11 Kan. App. 2d 612, 613, 614, 615, 616, 731 P.2d 881 (1987).

5. Statute does not violate Kansas constitution's prohibition against imprisonment for debt. State v. Jones, 241 Kan. 627, 739 P.2d 933 (1987).

6. Paragraph (1)(c) does not violate Kansas constitutional prohibition (B.R. § 16) against imprisonment for debt. State v. Jones, 242 Kan. 385, 390, 392, 748 P.2d 839 (1988).

7. Where party to security agreement executed in Kansas disposes of collateral out-of-state venue proper in county agreement executed. State v. Jurdan, 258 Kan. 848, 850, 855, 893 P.2d 267 (1995).

8. Restitution limited to losses caused by crime for which defendant was convicted unless, by plea agreement, defendant has agreed to pay for other losses. State v. Dexter, 276 Kan. 909, 80 P.3d 1125 (2003).