KANSAS OFFICE of
  REVISOR of STATUTES

  

Home >> Statutes >> Back


Click to open printable format in new window.Printable Format
 | Next

8-530.

History: L. 1937, ch. 283, § 30; L. 1938, ch. 59, § 2; L. 1959, ch. 52, § 1; L. 1970, ch. 51, § 2; L. 1971, ch. 21, § 1; L. 1972, ch. 28, § 3; L. 1973, ch. 30, § 4; Repealed, L. 1974, ch. 33, § 8-2205; July 1.

Source or prior law:

8-121.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Accessory properly charged as principal in information or complaint. State v. Cook, 149 Kan. 481, 482, 87 P.2d 648.

2. Application of section in workmen's compensation case considered but not determined. Woodring v. United Sash & Door Co., 152 Kan. 413, 418, 103 P.2d 837.

3. Fourth-degree manslaughter; driving car while drunk; information sufficient. State v. Spohr, 171 Kan. 129, 130, 131, 230 P.2d 1013.

4. Discussed; trial court erred in discharging defendant charged with manslaughter. State v. Goetz, 171 Kan. 703, 706, 237 P.2d 246.

5. Mentioned; petition failed to state cause of action for punitive damages. Gesslein v. Britton, 175 Kan. 661, 662, 266 P.2d 263.

6. Conviction hereunder; instructions, evidence and alleged trial errors considered; affirmed. State v. Hazen, 176 Kan. 594, 272 P.2d 1117.

7. City ordinance on same subject, upheld. City of Garden City v. Miller, 181 Kan. 360, 362, 365, 367, 368, 311 P.2d 306.

8. Evidence reviewed; defendant's motion for directed verdict properly overruled. State v. Dill, 182 Kan. 174, 319 P.2d 172.

9. Offense hereunder held included within information charging fourth-degree manslaughter. State v. Gibler, 182 Kan. 578, 579, 581, 322 P.2d 829.

10. Chemical test under K.S.A. 8-1001 through 8-1007 not prerequisite to prosecution hereunder. State v. Barry, 183 Kan. 792, 793, 797, 798, 332 P.2d 549.

11. Record examined, various alleged trial errors considered; conviction upheld. State v. Thomson, 188 Kan. 171, 173, 176, 360 P.2d 871.

12. Erroneous testimony concerning blood test ordered stricken and jury directed to disregard it; nonprejudicial; conviction upheld. State v. Johnson, 190 Kan. 795, 378 P.2d 167.

13. Plea of guilty and payment of fine and acceptance of parole constitute acquiescence in judgment; court without authority to set aside plea. State v. Morse, 191 Kan. 328, 329, 380 P.2d 310.

14. Evidence held sufficient to sustain finding defendant was driver of vehicle; conviction upheld. State v. Gregory, 191 Kan. 687, 689, 383 P.2d 965.

15. State not required to prove defendant "drunk" or "intoxicated." State v. Grimes, 193 Kan. 294, 297, 392 P.2d 926.

16. Result of criminal prosecution not to be considered at license revocation hearing. Marbut v. Motor Vehicle Department, 194 Kan. 620, 622, 623, 400 P.2d 982.

17. Mentioned in distinguishing between prosecution for violation of this section and civil proceeding under K.S.A. 8-1001. Hazlett v. Motor Vehicle Department, 195 Kan. 439, 443, 407 P.2d 551.

18. Retail liquor license revoked; driving while intoxicated is violation of "intoxicating liquor law." Keck v. Cheny, 196 Kan. 535, 537, 413 P.2d 119.

19. Evidence of violation of section; insufficient to support implication of malice in prosecution under K.S.A. 21-407. State v. Jensen, 197 Kan. 427, 430, 417 P.2d 273.

20. Blood alcohol test inadmissible; failure to lay foundation; instruction based thereon improper. State v. Foster, 198 Kan. 52, 442 P.2d 964.

21. Request that defendant submit to blood alcohol test not violation of constitutional rights. State v. Walker, 199 Kan. 508, 513, 430 P.2d 268.

22. Conviction hereunder; instruction as to "under influence of intoxicating liquor" upheld. State v. Sauvage, 201 Kan. 555, 441 P.2d 861.

23. Defendant charged hereunder; terms defined in K.S.A. 8-103 interpreted; appeal from dismissal sustained. State v. Carter, 202 Kan. 63, 446 P.2d 759.

24. No right to assistance of counsel prior to police requirement for heel-to-toe balance test for sobriety. State v. Faidley, 202 Kan. 517, 518, 522, 450 P.2d 20.

25. Admission of results of blood tests taken without consent of defendant error; conviction reversed. State v. Gordon, 219 Kan. 643, 654, 549 P.2d 886.

26. Mentioned in holding that offense of operation of motor vehicle while under influence of intoxicating liquor applies to operation upon private as well as public property. State v. Budden, 226 Kan. 150, 151, 595 P.2d 1138.

27. Terms "operate" and "drive" are synonymous. State v. Fish, 228 Kan. 204, 205, 206, 612 P.2d 180.


Previous | Next