CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Noncompliance with section mentioned. Felton v. Rubow, 163 Kan. 82, 84, 85, 179 P.2d 935.

2. Construed; section held not complied with; motion to strike petition sustained. Bradley v. Sudler, 172 Kan. 367, 368, 369, 239 P.2d 921; 174 Kan. 293, 294, 255 P.2d 650.

3. Inapplicable to members of Kansas bar residing in Kansas. Dyche v. Crawford, 183 Kan. 441, 442, 443, 444, 445, 446, 448, 327 P.2d 1047.

4. Inapplicable to regular practicing member of Kansas bar; cases reviewed and distinguished. Slayman v. Steinhoff, 185 Kan. 88, 89, 340 P.2d 98.

5. Petition filed and signed by Kansas attorney proper; nonresident associate counsel. Slayman v. Steinhoff, 185 Kan. 88, 89, 340 P.2d 98; Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. Cities Service Gas Co., 185 Kan. 315, 316, 341 P.2d 1012.

6. Attorney admitted and practicing in Kansas and another state must associate local attorney. Taylor v. Taylor, 185 Kan. 324, 325, 327, 328, 342 P.2d 190.

7. Noncompliance by foreign attorney not jurisdictional but action abated until compliance made. Thornburg v. McClelland, 186 Kan. 20, 21, 22, 23, 348 P.2d 617.

8. Section and supreme court rules (41, 54) regulating admissions to bar and practice of law valid. Martin v. Davis, 187 Kan. 473, 475, 476, 477, 480, 482, 357 P.2d 782.

9. Section and supreme court rules (41, 54) regulating admissions to bar and practice of law valid. Martin v. Davis, 187 Kan. 473, 475, 476, 477, 480, 482, 357 P.2d 782. Appeal dismissed: 368 U.S. 25, 82 S. Ct. 1, 2, 7 L. Ed. 2d 5.

10. Defendant's use of out-of-state counsel at preliminary hearing without Kansas counsel did not make proceeding a nullity. State v. Daegele, 193 Kan. 314, 315, 393 P.2d 978.

11. Prosecution by information constitutional; Missouri lawyer could represent defendant in murder case though not associated with a Kansas lawyer; waiver. Blakesley v. Crouse, 332 F.2d 849, 850.

12. Representation by attorney not licensed in state; failure to request licensed counsel; waiver. Blakesley v. State, 199 Kan. 128, 129, 427 P.2d 497.

13. Cited in holding trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing a further continuance of the trial. Fouts v. Armstrong Commercial Laundry Distributing Co., 209 Kan. 59, 65, 495 P.2d 1390.

14. Trial court's action in denying continuance and refusal to allow out of state counsel to present case in proceeding under K.S.A. 60-1507 constituted abuse of discretion. Oswald v. State, 214 Kan. 162, 166, 167, 519 P.2d 624.

15. Notice of intended dismissal mailed to local counsel sufficient under statutes. Frost v. Hardin, 218 Kan. 260, 264, 265, 543 P.2d 941.

16. A civil litigant may appear through attorney or pro se. Hickman v. Frerking, 4 Kan. App. 2d 590, 592, 609 P.2d 682.

17. No abuse of discretion by trial court in issuing order of disqualification of out-of-state attorney. Skahan v. Powell, 8 Kan. App. 2d 204, 208, 211, 653 P.2d 1192 (1982).

18. Nonlawyer inmates representing other inmates as legal counsel in court proceedings are engaged in unauthorized practice of law. State ex rel. Stephan v. O'Keefe, 235 Kan. 1022, 1034, 686 P.2d 171 (1984).

19. Whether court erred by dismissing case because out-of-state attorney violated statutory appearance requirements examined. Architectural & Engineered Products Co. v. Whitehead, 19 Kan. App. 2d 378, 380, 869 P.2d 766 (1994).

20. Out-of-state attorney's failure to comply with statutory requirements to practice in state did not vacate judgment. Rafferty v. Land O'Lakes Inc., 266 Kan. 64, 67, 965 P.2d 825 (1998).