KANSAS OFFICE of
  REVISOR of STATUTES

  

Home >> Statutes >> Back


Click to open printable format in new window.Printable Format
 | Next

19-2926.

History: L. 1939, ch. 164, § 13; L. 1965, ch. 178, § 15; L. 1980, ch. 63, § 3; Repealed, L. 1991, ch. 56, § 28; January 1, 1992.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Order denying application for permit to build mobile home park unreasonable. Scherrer v. Board of County Commissioners, 201 Kan. 424, 425, 441 P.2d 901.

2. Persons bringing action hereunder must show, by a preponderance of the evidence, the unreasonableness of governing body's action. Creten v. Board of County Commissioners, 204 Kan. 782, 783, 785, 789, 466 P.2d 263.

3. Denial of application for conditional use permits not unreasonable. International Villages, Inc. of Amer. v. Board of Comm'rs of Jefferson Co., 224 Kan. 654, 658, 585 P.2d 999.

4. Amendment of mandamus petition adding appeal pursuant to K.S.A. 19-2926 relates back to date of original petition. Affirmed. Martin Marietta Aggregates v. Board of Leavenworth County Comm'rs, 5 Kan. App. 2d 774, 777, 780, 781, 625 P.2d 516.

5. Discussed relative to time limits for appeals from zoning decisions. Bolser v. Zoning Board for Aubry Township, 228 Kan. 6, 9, 12, 13, 612 P.2d 563.

6. Action to test validity of conditional use permit barred because appeal not taken within thirty days after order of issuance. Amerine v. Board of Jefferson County Comm'rs, 7 Kan. App. 2d 491, 644 P.2d 477 (1982).

7. Cited in holding that validity of city zoning ordinance reviewable only under K.S.A. 12-712; K.S.A. 60-1701 inapplicable. St. John v. City of Salina, 9 Kan. App. 2d 636, 638, 684 P.2d 464 (1984).

8. Cited; term "regulation in K.S.A. 12-712 includes actions on special use permits and provides procedures for obtaining appellate review. Sprint Print, Inc. v. City of Overland Park, 238 Kan. 230, 234, 235, 708 P.2d 210 (1985).

9. Applicability of 30-day statute of limitations as appropriate limitation for actions challenging rezoning decisions considered. Landau v. City Council of Overland Park, 244 Kan. 257, 273, 767 P.2d 1290 (1989).

10. Petition in mandamus on disqualification of law firm treated as interlocutory appeal examined. Parker v. Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft, 245 Kan. 580, 586, 781 P.2d 1099 (1989).

11. Use of land for hunting preserve as agricultural use not requiring special permit determined. Corbet v. Board of Shawnee County Comm'rs, 14 Kan. App. 2d 123, 124, 783 P.2d 1310 (1990).


Previous | Next